A Nuclear Tinged Pact, and a Kingdom Kept in Place

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — On Sept. 17, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement in the Saudi capital, pledging that an attack on either will be treated as an attack on both. Saudi officials cast the pact as “comprehensive,” covering “all military means.” Pakistan’s defense minister briefly hinted that certain “capabilities” could be made available under the pact, then pulled back—leaving a deliberate ambiguity that hangs over the deal like a nuclear shadow, unspoken but implied.

In a country where the commute is brisk and conversation careful, the message lands with a familiar thud: insurance for the house of Saud. For many ordinary Saudis, that is both the point and the problem. Security guarantees are made with foreign partners, not with the public. The state remains something administered to them, not by them.

Night after night, the scenes from Gaza and the West Bank play across television channels and social feeds, deepening public anger. The royal family reads the mood and the hierarchy in Washington. If forced to choose between Saudi Arabia and Jerusalem, America will always prioritise Israel. Fearful of the public anger from its own population against US foreign policy in the Middle East , the Kingdom has begun searching for alternatives: in Beijing on March 10, 2023, it signed a China-brokered accord restoring ties with Iran; through OPEC+, it has drawn closer to Russia on oil policy; and step by step it has diversified away from automatic U.S. primacy while keeping the Americas and Britains decades long protection of the Saudi Royal family.

⸻

A Bargain Older Than the Treaty

The architecture predates the oil towers. Abdulaziz Ibn Saud retook Riyadh in 1902 and built outward. Britain underwrote and recognized his ascent—first with wartime protection, then with formal recognition by the late 1920s. After President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1945 meeting with Ibn Saud aboard the USS Quincy, the American guarantee set: oil for security, security for oil. The layers thickened—bases, training missions, arms packages—and the throne held.

Inside the kingdom, security shaped politics. The Saudi National Guard guarded the dynasty as much as the borders; access to contracts and careers ran through the royal court. Dissent was discouraged, then criminalized, with periodic execution surges signaling the price of resistance. The logic that followed proved durable: order over participation.

⸻

Pakistan’s Role—Close-In Reassurance

For decades, Pakistani soldiers and trainers have rotated through Saudi Arabia, officially for training and security duties. In practice, their presence functioned as close-in reassurance—a friendly, capable force at the right proximity on the worst day. In the quiet shorthand many Saudis use: recognized by Britain, kept by America, guarded by Pakistan. The new pact does not invent that inner ring; it formalizes and tightens it.

⸻

Why Now

Beyond missiles and drones lies mood — a combustible anger in Riyadh’s streets. Screens in coffee shops loop images from Gaza and the West Bank, fuelling resentment at a U.S. policy openly tilted toward Israel.
The Abraham Accords, once sold as the architecture that would lock U.S., Israeli, and Saudi security together, lie in ruins after Israel’s Gaza operations. What was meant to bind now exposes fracture: Washington clings to Tel Aviv, and Riyadh drifts away.

The House of Saud has recalibrated — cutting deals with Russia in OPEC+, relying on Chinese brokerage in the 2023 thaw with Iran, and now tilting decisively toward Pakistan. Outwardly it looks like prudence in a rough neighbourhood. Inwardly it signals rupture: independence from automatic U.S. alignment, legitimacy management through new partners, and a strategic shift that brings Pakistan inside the tent.

⸻

India Watches, Quietly

India, bound to Riyadh by energy and investment, has opted for restraint—to study the implications rather than stage alarm. The nuclear ambiguity is a reminder that the subcontinent’s deterrence ladder can now cast a faint shadow over the Gulf. For New Delhi, the wiser course is diplomacy, not theater.

⸻

What Changes—and What Won’t

• Deterrence: Up. The nominal cost of striking Saudi territory rises.

• Transparency: Flat. The gravest questions—who decides, on what trigger, with which weapons—remain behind closed doors.

• Domestic politics: Unchanged. The pact fortifies continuity at the top; it does not widen participation.

• Geopolitics: Hedging. The kingdom keeps the American shield while adding Pakistani proximity, Chinese brokerage and Russian oil discipline.

⸻

Back at the café, talk returns to a cousin’s stalled permit and a school fee coming due. That, too, is part of the architecture. Grand strategy travels downward as paperwork and favors. Treaties are signed at the palace; accountability does not travel with them.

The Riyadh–Islamabad pact is a new layer on an old bargain. It raises the price of attacking Saudi soil and reassures a monarchy that has long treated the state as private stewardship under foreign insurance. It is a pact with the House, not with the public. Deterrence may keep missiles out; it has never let ballots in.