For more than forty years, the Chinese economy has sustained growth, industrial upgrading, and social stability under a system Western economics said could not function. It was not just cheap labour, exports, or repression. It was an institutional invention that fused markets with state power. The uncomfortable question is no longer why the Chinese economy rose, but why prevailing theory still cannot explain it.
Telegraph Online long read A war with Iran would not be decided by intent or rhetoric, but by logistics. The United States can sustain an intense campaign for only a few days before stocks run out.
Labour’s decision to prevent Andy Burnham from standing in a safe by election was framed as procedural. The backlash from MPs, unions, and activists suggests something deeper: a party that has learned to prioritise internal control over confidence in its own coalition.
Europe’s response to Donald Trump’s return is not pragmatic alliance management but a doctrine of appeasement. Repeated concessions to Washington have hardened dependency into habit, hollowed out sovereignty, empowered internal veto holders, and trained institutions to avoid using their own power. This essay explains how appeasement to Trump became path dependent and why it now functions as managed decline.
Around the world engineers keep throwing more data at their models, hoping that scale alone will unlock something resembling intuition or agency. It will not. Intelligence emerges from evolution and from competition anchored in scarcity and survival. Until AI systems are given stakes, persistence and an internal reward structure, they remain tools. This article explains why the missing ingredient is evolutionary pressure.
Robotaxis are no longer just prototypes. Waymo now delivers over a million paid rides each month in American cities, while Baidu’s Apollo Go runs fully driverless cabs across Chinese and Gulf cities and chases breakeven in Wuhan. Behind them, Nvidia sells the compute, Uber chases bookings, and regulators decide who can rewrite their streets.
Ukraine’s front is no longer holding, Kiev’s power networks are held together by generators, and Europe is speaking loudly about a war it has neither the army nor the public to fight. Drawing on Telegraph Online’s own investigative sources, this long read examines the military collapse, the managed corruption in Kiev, the Black Sea tanker attacks and what a settlement on Russian terms really means for NATO.
Lieutenant General Apti Alaudinov, a Chechen commander at the heart of Moscow’s war machine, says Russia is winning a deliberate slow grind in Ukraine with drones, attrition and hypersonic missiles. He claims Ukraine is bleeding faster than it can mobilise while Russian forces preserve manpower and hold back tanks. This article unpacks his story using Russian official figures and doctrine as the reference frame.
Japan’s new prime minister has forced a choice that Tokyo spent decades avoiding. By calling a Taiwan conflict a threat to Japan’s survival, Sanae Takaichi has pleased Washington and enraged Beijing while riding high in the polls at home. Behind the drama sits a harder project that links whitewashed war memory, rearmed forces and a disposable foreign workforce.
The twenty eight point peace plan now on the table does not end the Ukraine war on Western terms. It writes into law what the battlefield has already decided. Ukraine is pushed out of NATO, loses more land, and becomes a neutral buffer, while Europe discovers it was collateral in a project that overreached from the start.
For two years Western governments and media promised victory in Ukraine, portraying Russia as weak and isolated. That narrative has collapsed. Sanctions failed, NATO’s industrial base faltered, and the battlefield turned. Europe faces de-industrialisation while Russia’s economy and army expand. The press that once sold triumph now prepares audiences for retreat, conditioning the public for a negotiated peace — one dictated on Moscow’s terms, not Washington’s.
Javier Milei’s sweeping mid-term victory was more than a political win. It marked the first real-world test of Austrian economics the belief that free prices, hard money, and minimal state control can rebuild a nation from the ground up. After years of crisis, voters backed his radical plan to shrink government, balance the budget, and restore confidence in Argentina’s currency.