After Maduro’s capture, the U.S. tightens what officials call an “oil blockade” and Venezuela’s poor take the first blow
by Jaffa Levy
·
Published
· Updated
If you want to understand sanctions, stop picturing diplomacy and start picturing a medieval siege.
Not the theatrical kind with ladders and flaming pitch, but the slow kind. Gates are not officially shut. Roads are not formally cut. Yet essentials fail to arrive in usable volume, revenue cannot leave cleanly, and the poorest take the first blow. The weapon is constriction.
That is Venezuela again, now. There is no declared naval blockade in the narrow international law sense. No public exclusion zone. No admiral reading out coordinates. Ships still sail. Ports still open. And yet the trade system barely moves.
In the shipping and energy world, the symptoms are practical and immediate. Tankers hesitate before loading. Insurers tighten terms or retreat. Payments jam mid chain because banks and compliance teams refuse to touch the flow. Cargoes sit offshore, stuck in limbo.
This is pressure by paperwork, backed by steel close enough to be read as a warning, without ever admitting it is a blockade.
AIS, OFAC, over compliance
AIS is the tracking signal ships transmit. OFAC is the US Treasury office that administers sanctions. Over compliance is what happens when firms refuse even lawful activity because the penalties for a mistake are existential.
This is why exemptions can exist on paper while the system still refuses to move. Banks do not need a moral position. They need only to fear that one bad decision ends their access, triggers enforcement, or burns them with regulators. So lawful transactions become commercially impossible. The risk is not worth it. The refusal spreads.
THE CHILL IS PHYSICAL
The maritime posture is not a sideshow. It is part of the coercion.
A heavy US military presence in the Caribbean, including the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford strike group, sends a message without printing it on a noticeboard. It says the trade is being watched. It says interdiction is plausible. It says insurers and owners are not just dealing with paperwork, but with a real escalation ladder.
You do not need to prove that every ship will be stopped. You only need to make enough of the market believe it might. That is how deterrence works in shipping. The fear arrives before the boarding party.
Owners hesitate. Charterers demand indemnities. Insurers tighten terms. Banks slow or refuse payment flows. Compliance departments default to no. The siege is not delivered by a single act. It is delivered when enough private actors behave as if the blockade already exists.
CREDIBILITY BEATS FREQUENCY
A siege works when the defenders believe the roads are no longer safe. Enforcement does not need to be constant. It needs to be credible.
Once seizure risk becomes plausible, insurers and banks do not wait for certainty. They retreat early because the downside is fatal. Cargoes stall. Ships linger offshore. Ports become operationally open and commercially closed. That is how modern coercion scales. It pushes the private sector into self policing.
STORAGE IS WHERE THE METAPHOR BECOMES PHYSICS
This is the moment the siege stops being rhetoric.
Oil production is continuous. Exports are the release valve that turns barrels into revenue. When exports stall, crude fills tanks. Then tankers become floating storage. Once storage is saturated, operators cut output whether they want to or not. The system backs up into the wells.
Why running out of storage forces production cuts
When crude and residual fuel cannot leave in sufficient volume, stocks fill onshore tanks and then fill offshore tankers used as floating storage. Once capacity is near full, production must be curtailed to avoid operational failure. Even short disruptions can become brutal because the chain is continuous and capacity is finite.
WHEN THE LEGAL ROUTE IS STRANGLED, SHADOW TRADE RETURNS
When normal trade becomes commercially radioactive, it does not always stop. It mutates.
Tracking goes quiet. Routes become indirect. Cargoes get blended or relabelled. Payments shift toward middlemen, barter like arrangements, and opaque channels. This is not resilience. It is expensive adaptation. Shadow trade is friction. It is discounts. It is intermediaries feeding on risk. Even when oil moves, it moves on worse terms and with greater leakage.
VENEZUELA IS POOR BECAUSE SANCTIONS STRIP REVENUE AND FINANCE
Telegraph.com states the plainly, because it is the spine of our story.
Venezuela is poor because sanctions have stripped the country of its oil revenue in usable form and have cut it off from normal finance, turning the entire economy into a high risk zone that banks, insurers, shipowners, and suppliers treat as untouchable.
This does not mean Venezuela’s own failures do not exist. They do. But the decisive fact is structural. When you constrict the revenue artery of a petrostate and frighten the trade system away from handling its flows, you are not merely punishing ministers in Caracas. You are impoverishing the country.
DEFAULT AND DEBT OVERHANG REMOVE THE ESCAPE HATCH
Sanctions hurt more when a country cannot borrow through the shock.
Venezuela’s default and debt overhang matter because they shut the normal options. When exports stall, a country with market access can borrow short term to stabilise imports and services. Venezuela cannot do that cleanly under this risk regime and this legal overhang. So the shock lands directly on households and services, in real time, through scarcity and loss of purchasing power.
Debt overhang, in plain English
Default cuts off normal market borrowing and raises legal and compliance risk around payment flows and assets. A trade shock that might be bridged elsewhere becomes a direct hit to imports, services, and living standards.
WHEN RESERVES BECOME HOSTAGES
This siege logic is not only about ships and banks. It is also about custody.
Venezuela’s gold held at the Bank of England has been locked in long running litigation tied to recognition disputes. Whatever one thinks of the politics, the functional lesson is clear. If reserves can be immobilised abroad, then reserves are no longer neutral infrastructure. They are leverage.
A state that cannot count on its reserves cannot stabilise its currency or pay its way through a trade squeeze. That is how a siege tightens.
ON THE HUMAN CONSEQUENCES
When payment channels jam and imports become legally toxic, the consequences do not arrive as headlines. They arrive as absence. Medicines fail to procure reliably. Medical equipment and spare parts become harder to source. Households lose purchasing power. Families in poverty are hit first, and children are hit hardest, because health systems are fragile and time sensitive. That is what the exemptions myth conceals. A permission that cannot be executed is not a protection.
Iraq: the sanctions decade and the children
Iraq remains the historical reference point because children and infants were central to what the world saw. Major surveys during the 1990s reported sharply worse child mortality, and those figures shaped global memory of what comprehensive economic restriction can do.
Later work argued that parts of the data record were manipulated and that the headline totals were overstated. That dispute matters, and the numbers should not be repeated as gospel.
But the mechanism is not disputed: broad trade and financial restriction degrades living standards and public health systems, and it concentrates harm on the vulnerable. In a siege economy, infants do not get a carve out.
Iran: medicine exempt on paper, scarce in practice
Iran illustrates the modern version of the same squeeze. Exemptions can exist for medicines, yet shortages still occur because procurement relies on banks, shipping, insurers, and counterparties that refuse to process lawful trade once risk screens start flashing.
Researchers and human rights groups have documented drug shortages and supply disruption during sanctions periods, including for essential medicines. A recurring driver is over compliance by banks and firms, not a written ban on a specific drug.
The result is quietly brutal: the sanctions regime does not need to forbid a medicine to make it disappear from a pharmacy.
Yemen: imports, hunger, and the chill of designation
Yemen is war first. But the designation and sanctions layer matters because Yemen lives on imports and on access to payment channels. When financial risk designations rise, banks and shippers step away before lawyers finish debating exemptions.
That chill does not merely slow aid. It threatens the commercial import system that actually feeds people. Even temporary disruption can cascade through prices, fuel availability, and household purchasing power.
In an import dependent country, a sanctions chill behaves like a siege whether or not anyone uses the word.
Afghanistan: liquidity collapse and mass impoverishment
Afghanistan shows how quickly a population can fall when banking connectivity and liquidity seize up. When money cannot move, everything else follows: wages, purchasing power, trade finance, and the ability of institutions to function.
UNDP warned after 2021 that Afghanistan was at risk of near universal poverty without urgent stabilisation. Whatever the stated intent of policy choices, the structural effect was plain: when liquidity dies, households pay first.
A modern siege does not always cut roads. Sometimes it cuts the balance sheet, and the country collapses inward.
THE SYSTEM, NOT THE ACCIDENT
Telegraph.com Describes it as a system, because that is how it functions.
A government wins power and becomes strategically unacceptable. External powers label it illegitimate or criminal. Sanctions tighten around the revenue base and access to finance. Living standards fall, most sharply for the poor. Opposition capacity is supported through external channels. Instability rises. Negotiations become coercive. The target state is pushed toward political capitulation or fracture.
This is not an accidental byproduct. It is the operating logic of maximum pressure. And it is adjustable in real time. That is what makes it modern.
This is how Venezuela is being throttled
There is no need for a declared blockade by The USA when you can make the trade system self police. Park enough power offshore for insurers and banks to feel it. Demonstrate that seizures can happen. Let compliance departments do the rest. Exports stall. Storage fills. Production is cut. Imports choke. The poor absorb the shock first.
A medieval siege starved a city by cutting the roads. A modern siege can do it by cutting the transaction, and letting the market enforce the choke for you.
